Skip to content

Author: anthony

Home Affairs Committee Inquiry

Home Affairs Committee Inquiry into Home Office preparedness for COVID-19 (Coronavirus)

An immigration detainee has already tested positive for COVID-19 at Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre (IRC). IRCs are high risk for clusters of COVID-19, and staff provide a conduit for infection to and from the community.

The response to COVID-19 within IRCs has already been problematic. It is widely acknowledged that even at the best of times, healthcare in IRCs is entirely inadequate and that detention can exacerbate existing medical conditions.

Many detainees are especially vulnerable due to their co-existing physical illnesses.

Click here to see the written evidence submitted by Medical Justice

Update on our work and office during the COVID-19 pandemic

Medical Justice operations during the Coronavirus pandemic

The Medical Justice team has had to make a few adjustments to ensure we do our best to protect the health of our staff, volunteers, clients and that of the wider community.

Medical Justice knows that many immigration detainees are particularly worried at this time.

Immigration detention is not part of any criminal sentence; it is purely for the administrative convenience of the Home Office.  By continuing to hold immigration detainees, the Home Office is risking public health, including that of detainees and immigration removal centre staff, for its own administrative convenience – this is unconscionable, and we continue to challenge it in every way we can.

Continue reading “Update on our work and office during the COVID-19 pandemic”

Detainees At Risk From COVID-19

Medical Justice demands release of all immigration detainees to prevent an outbreak of COVID-19 inside detention

Coronavirus: call to release UK immigration centre detainees / The Guardian / 14th March 2020

In light of the emerging COVID-19 situation Medical Justice is concerned for its vulnerable clients. Immigration detention can exacerbate existing medical conditions and our volunteer doctors see concerning levels of medical mistreatment in immigration removal centres.

 

This is particularly germane as immigration detention is not part of any criminal sentence ; immigration detainees are held purely for the administrative convenience of the Home Office who have the power to release all detainees immediately to prevent an outbreak of COVID-19 inside detention.

By continuing to hold immigration detainees in custody, the Home Office is risking public health, including that of detainees and immigration removal centre staff, for its own administrative convenience – this is unconscionable.

Prince Fosu Inquest

Neglect contributed to the death of an immigration detainee died naked and emaciated in ‘strip cell’ – others remain at risk

Prince Fosu died on 30th October 2012, 6 days after being detained at Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre (IRC). He suffered undiagnosed, untreated psychosis and related bizarre behaviour, dehydration, malnourishment and hypothermia. He died alone, on the concrete floor of a ‘strip cell’ in segregation with no mattress, having had little if any food, fluid or sleep.  He was naked, emaciated, and covered in debris.

Prince Fosu had been found running down a street with no clothes on. He was arrested and sent to Harmondsworth IRC.  There was a complete failure by guards and doctors contracted by the Home Office to recognise that Prince was mentally ill, to follow immigration detention policies and to properly document and monitor his wellbeing. Where they existed, records included noting Prince Fosu’s “non-compliant” behaviour and that he “declined” food, fresh air, showers and to see doctors.

The scale of the collapse of all ‘safeguards’ cannot be overstated. It happened at every turn, within Harmondsworth, the Home Office, healthcare, and the Independent Monitoring Board who acknowledge that Prince Fosu died “in plain sight”. None took purposeful steps to prevent Prince Fosu dying “in plain sight”. During the inquest many were unable to explain why they acted as they did; others gave explanations that were difficult to fathom.  3 doctors working for Harmondsworth have been reported to the General Medical Council for review.

Had proper assessment been undertaken and appropriate treatment provided, Prince Fosu may have lived.

Verdict / Cause of death:

Record of death: Sudden death following hypothermia, dehydration and malnourishment in a man with psychotic illness”

Further findings: “The failure of Primecare staff to effectively see, assess and provide healthcare to Mr Fosu is inexplicable … Doctors contracted by the Jersey Practice showed insufficient professional curiosity throughout Mr Fosu’s detention.  This lacking in professional curiosity resulted in an absence of any kind of medical intervention which in turn contributed to Mr Fosu’s deterioration … GP  record keeping was inconsistent where notes did appear, there was a failure to record anything meaningful … there was gross failure across all agencies to recognise the need for an provide appropriate care in a person who was unable to look after himself or change his circumstances … this was in part due to the failure to address, recognise, monitor and respond to Mr Fosu’s deteriorating condition.  Neglect contributed to the cause of death.”

 

Emma Ginn, Director of Medical Justice said:

“Prince Fosu was dehumanised. The failure of individual professional responsibility in this case was staggering. IRC doctors, Home Office officials and guards treated Prince Fosu’s life with casual contempt and effectively watched him die right in front of them.  There is nothing to prevent it happening again tomorrow.

 Policies were clearly not protective enough, and the training and supervision of staff was wholly ineffective.  On top of this the culture of disbelief pervading immigration detention had a fatal consequence.

 One IRC doctor said they did not regard detainees in segregation as patients and that they were only there to ‘fulfil a Home Office legal obligation’. It seemed they stopped acting like doctors when they stepped into the IRC.

 7 years on from Prince Fosu’s death, lessons have not been learned ; our independent volunteer doctors still see mentally ill detainees held in segregation who have become psychotic, suicidal, stopped eating and drinking, and lost mental capacity.  Furthermore, the Home Office argued to the end of the inquest that Prince Fosu may have died of natural causes.

 Many detainees experience a potentially lethal cocktail of medical mistreatment, severe deterioration of their already vulnerable health, and dangerous conditions. Since Prince Fosu’s death, some Home Office policy changes have made detention more harmful and 30 immigration detainees have died, including 4 at Harmondsworth.   

  Immigration removal centres should be closed before another detainee dies.” 

 

Mr V (detained in 2019 and previously held in segregation in Harmonsworth IRC) said:

 “The inquest into Prince’s death just brings back the feelings of neglect, lack of empathy, lack of care and the sheer practice of brutality in the most open form with no repercussions. Having experienced this myself first hand I feel like Fosu’s death could easily have been my death. “

 

Quotes from Prince Fosu’s father, Mr Obeng, and his solicitor as well as INQUEST and more details of the case can be found in INQUEST’s press release here.

Available for interview: Mr V, and Medical Justice staff – Emma Ginn, Kris Harris and Dr Mary Kamara.

Contact : emma.ginn@medicaljustice.org.uk

 

Notes

  1. Prince Fosu was a 31 year old Ghanaian. He is survived by his wife, child and parents.
  2. Prince Fosu’s father had a valid passport and an airline ticket for his son. He asked that he be allowed to send his son to Ghana and was willing to be escorted to the airport. But the Home Office refused.
  3. The Home Office seems incapable of learning lessons – they have not learned from previous deaths, including that of Brian Dalrymple who died in Colnbrook IRC having been transferred there from Harmondsworth IRC just a few days earlier. His death involved many of the same staff, and the inquest uncovered strikingly similar failures in recognising and responding to signs of mental ill health and distress, clinical record keeping, effective checks in segregation, and doctor unaware of the existence of the Detention Centre Rules.
  4. A key Home Office witness in both inquests seemed to not remember the Brian Dalrymple case. When the barrister for Prince Fosu’s father put it to her, she said that Prince Fosu’s was her first and last case of death in custody.
  5. The General Medical Council must investigate at why none of the doctors, despite saying they were in an unfamiliar environment, not knowing about the rules, took any steps to fulfil their obligations to recognise and work within the limits of their competence. Their failures included basics such as writing proper notes (or any notes) and recognising detainees as potential patients.
  6. Harmondsworth staff deemed Prince Fosu to be on a ‘dirty protest’. The Home Office and IRCs continue to fail to recognise that some ‘dirty protests’ and food & fluid refusal are rooted in mental illness. Many detainees who are mentally ill and/or at risk of self-harm or suicide are inappropriately put in segregation.
  7. Medical Justice has flagged up fatal system failures in healthcare to the Home Office since 2005 but rather than welcome our evidence, it is all too often disregarded or rejected.
  8. It is contemptible that it took until the day the inquest opened for the Home Office to publish amendments to its Segregation policy limiting the removal of bedding from cells – we estimate that over 6,000 detainees will have been exposed to that risk since Prince Fosu died.
  9. Medical Justice doubts any policy improvements will prevent another death ; immigration detention in and of itself can be severely damaging, plus the prevalence of medical mistreatment, combined with two decades of consistent, proven Home Office failure to learn lessons.
  10. The doctors involved in Prince Fosu’s case worked at Harmondsworth for several months. They did not know of the existence of key policies protecting detainees that they alone could operate – so none of those fundamental protections against unlawful detention could be operated at the very least for those months. This calls into question how many cases where the Home Office said detentions were lawful because there were protections in place.
  11. The only way to end immigration detainee deaths is to end immigration detention. Medical Justice agrees with the British Medical Association that immigration removal centres should be phased out.
  12. The inquest – A long awaited decision to bring criminal charges against the private companies responsible for Prince Fosu’s care was reversed in October 2018.
  13. The family of Prince Fosu was represented by INQUEST Lawyers Group members Kate Maynard of Hickman and Rose solicitors and Nick Armstrong of Matrix Chambers.
  14. Other Interested persons represented are GEO, The Home Office, The Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police, the Independent Monitoring Board, Jersey Practice, Dr Wesley Joseph, Dr Sharif, Dr Singh, Dr Navqi, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, Mitie.
  15. About immigration detention : Previous inquests have concluded that neglect contributed to detainees’ deaths and the courts have made a number of findings that detention amounted to “inhuman and degrading treatment”. It is now widely accepted that immigration detention can exacerbate existing medical conditions and can be the cause of mental illness.
  16. Immigration detention is arbitrary and indefinite. It is not the consequence of any criminal activity nor is it judicially sanctioned yet 25,000 people are detained every year.
  17. About Medical Justice : Medical Justice is a charity that sends volunteer doctors into IRCs to assist detainees, documenting their scars of torture, medical conditions, and injuries sustained during removal attempts, and to challenge instances of medical mistreatment. With our medical evidence, we quantify the endemic extent and severity of harm suffered by immigration detainees.  We identify systemic healthcare failures to the Home Office and NHS England and where discussion fails, we may undertake strategic litigation.
  18. Some Medical Justice clients were eventually sectioned to a secure psychiatric unit – some were released into the community after many months, others were sent back to an IRC. We have seen an increasing number of clients who have eventually been released due to their mental illness but later detained again.
  19. Data on deaths of immigration detainees – There have been deaths in every single year since Prince Fosu died. There were 11 in 2017 alone. Since 2000 there have been XXX deaths of immigration detainees in IRCs, prisons, during deportation, or within four days of leaving detention.
  20. Recent inquests into deaths of immigration detainees identified: Carlington Spencer, 38, who died as a consequence of a stroke – a series of failings which possibly contributed. Bai Bai Ahmed Kabia, 49, who died as a result of a brain haemorrhage – missed opportunities that could possibly have prevented his death. Marcin Gwozdzinski, 28 – serious failings which contributed to his death. Amir Siman-Tov, 41, who died as a result of ‘misadventure’ – a critical narrative conclusion. Tarek Chowdhury, 64, was killed by another detainee experiencing serious mental ill health who had been inappropriately placed in immigration detention – numerous other critical failings. Michal Netyks, 35, died a self-inflicted death – serious criticisms of the immigration deportation process. Branko Zdravkovic, 43, died a self-inflicted death – serious failings, with the coroner writing a critical report to prevent future deaths.
  21. INQUEST information on Deaths of immigration detainees
  22. Medical Justice report : Death in immigration detention
  23. Medical Justice report : “A Secret Punishment ; The Misuse of Segregation in Immigration Detention

 

‘Gross failures’ contributed to man’s death in immigration centre…The Guardian 02/03/2020

Record Of Inquest For Prince Fosu

Basics Training Day for Clinicians – March 2020

Medical Justice basics training day.

Our next “basics” training day for clinicians interested in volunteering with Medical Justice is on 14th March 2020.

Our training is for medics who are interested in volunteering for Medical Justice as medico-legal report writers, visiting detainees in detention centres, assessing their health and documenting evidence of torture or trauma and other health issues.

Continue reading “Basics Training Day for Clinicians – March 2020”

Joint Committee on Human Rights Inquiry into Immigration Detention

Medical Justice welcomes this inquiry into the areas in which the UK’s immigration detention system fails to comply with human rights and fails to protect against arbitrary detention.

Medical Justice has been working with detainees in Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) across the UK since 2005 and has seen thousands of cases. We are the only organisation to send independent doctors into IRCs to document evidence of torture, challenge instances of inadequate healthcare and evidence the further harm that detention has caused.

Detention is harmful to those detained

There is consistent research evidence that detention harms detainees’ health. Those with pre-existing vulnerabilities, e.g. mental health issues or survivors of torture and other forms of cruel or inhuman treatment, including sexual violence and gender-based violence, are at particular risk of harm.

Lack of access to NHS equivalent healthcare

Healthcare in detention falls short of NHS equivalence. A summary of the shortcomings, including short consultations, late screenings, inadequate use of interpreters, poor clinical assessments, and lack of adherence to clinical protocols can be found here. We share the British Medical Association’s concern about inadequate healthcare and echo their call for a phasing out of immigration detention. We are particularly concerned about the treatment of vulnerable detainees with mental health issues who are denied access to the range and quality of treatments available in the community. We share the concern of the Royal College of Psychiatrists that IRCs are not therapeutic environments and therefore adequate treatment cannot be provided.

The current legal and policy framework for immigration detention does not prevent people from being detained wrongfully

This is evidenced by £21m paid in compensation for wrongful detention to 850 individuals between 2012 -2017. This does not include those who did not pursue legal action, which is likely to include many who were removed or too damaged by their experience to be aware of, or in a position to take up, legal challenges. The numbers must also be understood in relation to the target
driven culture in the Home Office, so evident in the Windrush scandal, which recently forced the Home Secretary to admit that the Home Office has ‘become too concerned with policy and strategy and sometimes loses sight of the individual’.

 

The full submission can be found here.

 

 

Detention of vulnerable persons

Briefing for Westminster Hall debate 14th March 2017

There has been a longstanding consensus that detention can have negative impact on all detainees’ health, but those with pre‐existing vulnerabilities, such as existing mental illness, serious physical health problems, disability and history of past torture or trauma are most at risk. This was reinforced by Stephen Shaw in his review (published 2016) and the literature review carried out by Prof Mary Bosworth on behalf of Mr Shaw.

Read more here