Skip to content

Author: anthony

The APPG on Immigration Detention has been re-established in the new Parliament

On 2 December 2024, parliamentarians held a meeting to re-establish the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Immigration Detention 

Following a vote by the membership, Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP (Labour) was elected as the APPG’s new Chair, and Rt Hon. the Lord Garnier KC (Conservative), Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) and Mohammad Yasin MP as its officers. Medical Justice was re-elected as the APPG’s secretariat. 

 

APPG meeting attendees (L-R): Lord German (Liberal Democrat), Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party), Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour), newly elected APPG Chair Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP (Labour) and Rt Hon. John McDonnell MP (Labour). 

 

First launched in 2019, the APPG – which temporarily ceased to exist in May due to the general election – brings together more than 25 parliamentarians from across the political spectrum who share concerns about the use of immigration detention in the UK. It works to raise awareness within Parliament about immigration detention and its impacts, and to offer a forum for MPs and Peers to debate with subject experts, including those with lived experience of detention. Using information gathered through its activities, the APPG advocates for evidence-based reforms to immigration detention policy and for the welfare of detained people. 

With a recent increase in the number of people being detained, a significant expansion of detention planned, and deeply concerning conditions reported at Brook House IRC and Harmondsworth IRC amongst others, it is vital that the use of immigration detention by the new government continues to be carefully scrutinised in Parliament. The  APPG will make an important contribution to this. 

Membership of the APPG is open to MPs and peers of any party. If you cannot see your MP on the APPG’s current members list, please considering writing to them and asking them to join. They can do so by emailing contact@appgdetention.org.uk 

Enter your postcode here to find your local MP and their contact details. 

You can stay up-to-date with the APPG’s ongoing work by following it on X/Twitter. 

Vacancy | Clinical Assessor – Doctor

We are recruiting for an exciting opportunity to join the Medical Justice team as soon as possible as a Clinical Assessor – Doctor.

Please see the Application Pack for more details.


Clinical Assessor – Doctor

 

Salary: £12,253.83 per annum per day (for 1 to 3 days a week; £61,269.13 per annum pro-rata).

Reports to: Clinical Advisor

Responsible for: Volunteer clinicians who may accompany your clinical assessments in a training/observer role

Job purpose: To carry out assessments for people detained in immigration removal centres (IRCs). To write Medico-legal reports in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol.

Working hours: 1-3 days a week (please indicate your preference on the application).

The post-holder will be expected to be flexible and to occasionally be available out of hours where urgent action is required regarding of one of their assessments (for example, if information is needed urgently for the client’s legal case, they might be asked to write a letter. There is no other requirement to provide on-call cover).

Flexible working hours and flexible arrangements for remote working are possible.

Where based: The post-holder will visit Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) to carry out assessments for people who are detained. Report writing can be done from our office in Finsbury Park or remotely. The post holder will be expected to attend occasional team meetings, trustees’ meetings, training events and other gatherings as required.

Length of contract: Length of contract Permanent. The probation period will be 6 months.

Terms: Pro rata 24 days per annum holiday, plus statutory bank holidays and 4 additional days’ holiday associated with bank holidays which may be decided on by your manager (usually associated with the office closure during Christmas and New Year).

To apply: Please read the application form and complete the form within it. Email your completed application form and your CV to Anthony at a.omar@medicaljustice.org.uk

Deadline for application: This role is being advertised on a rolling basis so we may close the vacancy when a suitable candidate is found. Shortlisted candidates will be asked to provide a sample of (anonymised) written work and will be invited for interview. The ideal timeframe for starting the job is as soon as possible.


For more information about Medical Justice, the full job description and application form, please download the Application Pack


We are proud to be a member of the Experts by Experience Employment Network (www.ebeemployment.org.uk), which aims to increase representation of people with lived experience in the charitable sector. Please feel free to use information and resources at https://www.ebeemployment.org.uk/ebe which may help in preparing your job application.

Immigration Detention statistics collated through Freedom of Information Requests

Medical Justice publishes new resource on Home Office Immigration Detention statistics collated through Freedom of Information Requests.

Medical Justice would like to share with you a new resource that we hope you and your networks will find useful in advocacy work regarding immigration detention. Medical Justice will now bi-annually publish Home Office detention statistics we have collated through regular Freedom of Information (FOI) Requests.

The statistics cover the following thematic areas:

  • Rule 35 reports 
  • Self-harm incidents and Assessment Care and Detention Teamwork (ACDT) 
  • Segregation 
  • Use of Force  

The statistics are now available here

 

For Medical Justice’s analysis on these and other thematic areas, please see our research reports here.

In particular, our report “If he dies, he dies”: What has changed since the Brook House Inquiry provides more detail and analysis on Rule 35, ACDT and self-harm, Segregation and Use of Force.

We will be regularly publishing information we receive through FOI requests for use by others including – but not limited to – the asylum, refugee and migrant sector, monitoring bodies, the legal sector, in strategic litigation, medical bodies and the media. We also hope it will help strengthen the sector’s advocacy work and also encourage others to also publish information they have received through FOI requests.

Please also forward on this resource to others you think may find it useful.


If you do use this resource, please credit Medical Justice as the source. We also would appreciate it if you could let us know when you use this resource, so we are able to keep track of how widely and well-used it is. Please email our researcher, Ariel, to let her know if you use this resource and also if you have any questions a.plotkin@medicaljustice.org.uk.

Vacancy | Fundraising Lead

A rare opportunity for an ambitious and driven Fundraising Lead to join a well respected and impactful human rights organisation to drive growth and challenge abuse in immigration detention.

3 days a week, £40,000 p/a pro-rata, hybrid and flexible working possibilities.  Office in Finsbury Park, London.

Medical Justice particularly welcomes applications from people with lived experience

Download the Application Pack.

 

We are looking for an outstanding Fundraising Lead to play a key role in developing and implementing our first formal fundraising strategy. You will be helping to develop our team of passionate and determined staff and volunteers committed to defending the medical and legal rights of our vulnerable detained clients. Your fundraising will enable Medical Justice to grow to the next level and together we will be changing the fate of even more people’s lives.

 

“The team at Medical Justice are very supportive, knowledgeable, and passionate about the work that they do, it has been a great environment to work in.”

– Medical Justice staff member.

 

“Staggeringly impressive group which merits the overused phrase punching well above their weight.” and “We are hugely enthusiastic as a trust about their work.”

– Medical Justice funder.

 

Job Purpose: Develop and implement a funding plan that will resource Medical Justice’s ambitious strategy, building partnerships with funders, increasing and diversifying funding streams.

Salary: £40,000 per annum pro rata, with an annual increase of £500 each year for 5 years and 5% pension contribution

Reports to: The Director

Working hours: 3 days a week – flexible working pattern possible

Based: The job is based at the Medical Justice office in Finsbury Park. You can work at home but should come in the office for 5 days a month, preferably including Tuesdays.

Length of contract: Permanent. The probation period is 6 months.

Annual Leave: 28 days per annum pro rata (including 4 days associated with bank holidays which may be decided on by your manager, usually associated with the office closure during Christmas and New Year) plus bank holidays.

Benefits: Includes ; enhanced parental leave and sick pay, one-to-one counselling sessions and group supervision sessions with a psychologist, ‘cycle to work scheme’, staff lunch on Tuesdays.

Timeline: The closing date for applications is midnight 26th January 2025. Shortlisting for interviews is planned for 31st January 2025 with interviews the following week at the Medical Justice office. Interviewing will include a written and verbal exercise. Medical Justice pays for travel expenses to and from the interview.

To apply: Please read the Application Pack which includes the Job Description and the application form. Email your competed application form and your CV to Anthony at a.omar@medicaljustice.org.uk

 

We look forward to receiving your application !


Information Sessions

We are offering informal information sessions about Medical Justice and its work as well as an opportunity to ask questions about the Fundraising Lead role and the organisation before the application deadline.

These sessions will take place on:

Tuesday 7th January – 12pm

Wednesday 15th January – 1pm

If you are interested in participating, please email our Office Manager, Anthony Omar on a.omar@medicaljustice.org.uk for more information.

House of Lords debate: Weakening of the Adults at Risk in Immigration Detention Statutory Guidance

 

“The standards by which we treat people in our society should be constant; whoever they are, human rights are human rights…. Where we are removing someone’s liberty, protections have to be significant. On current evidence, that balance has not been struck, and the treatment and safeguards for everyone in detention, particularly those with additional vulnerabilities, are just not sufficient.”

 Quote from speech by Lord German (Liberal Democrat)  

 


 

On 14 October 2024, members of the House of Lords, supported by Medical Justice, debated highly concerning changes to the Adults at Risk in Immigration Detention Statutory Guidance (AAR SG) that water down the protections provided to vulnerable detained people. 

 The changes, brought in by the last Conservative government, came into effect in May 2024. They include removing a previous statutory commitment to reducing the number of vulnerable people in detention, and granting the government the power to seek a second opinion – from a Home Office contracted doctor – on independent external medical evidence documenting a detained person’s vulnerability, delaying consideration of the available evidence for several weeks or more (known as the “Second Opinion Policy”). 

Despite having the option to withdraw the changes, the new Labour government has chosen to keep them in place. In light of this, and following previous parliamentary work led by Medical Justice to highlight concerns, Labour peer Baroness Lister of Burtersett tabled a debate in the House of Lords on the issue. 

Fourteen peers attended the debate, including Home Office Minister Lord Hanson of Flint, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and Lord Hunt of Wirral, Chair of the Lords’ Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC), The committee issued a critical report on the AAR SG changes earlier this year, following evidence submitted by Medical Justice. 

You can read key extracts from the debate below, including key points from peers and the government’s response.

The full video of the debate is available here, or you can read a written transcript here.


Written debate briefing for peers 

Medical Justice, in collaboration with eleven other NGOs, published a briefing for parliamentarians in advance of the debate, which explains AAR SG changes in more detail and highlights key concerns. 

You can download the debate written briefing here. 

The briefing is jointly badged with Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID), Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) UK, Refugee Council, Women for Refugee Women, the Helen Bamber Foundation, Detention Action, Association of Visitors to Immigration Detention (AVID), Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA), Freedom from Torture, Gatwick Detainees Welfare Group (GDWG), and Rainbow Migration.  


What did peers say?  

Peers raised a variety of serious concerns during the debate, both in relation to the AAR SG changes and wider issues in detention. You can read extracts below.  

 

In effect, the regulations reduce the protection provided by statutory guidance to adults at risk in detention, which could increase the risk of the kinds of human rights violations uncovered in the Brook House inquiry.

 Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour) 

 

“I have always thought that anyone seeking asylum or who is detained, is likely to be vulnerable…The whole of this population is vulnerable, but not all of them are protected under the legislation and the guidance…”

 Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)  

 

“I am deeply concerned that these regulations expressly remove the intention to reduce the numbers of people in detention who are vulnerable in specifically acute ways. As the Minister will know, the previous Government appear to have accepted just one of the Brook House inquiry’s 33 recommendations. I would welcome confirmation from the Minister that [the government] will revisit that inquiry report to ensure that all the recommendations are given due consideration for implementation.”

The Lord Bishop of Sheffield 

  

“There should be—indeed, there must be—a clear presumption that people at risk because of existing or potential mental health problems should not be detained. ‘Detained’ is a euphemism; they are, in effect, imprisoned. We imprison people as a punishment, so the need to avoid providing these people with punishment is clear.”

 Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour) 

 

“Fifty children were detained on the year to June 2024, 29 of them in Yarl’s Wood short-term holding facility and 10 in Gatwick pre-departure accommodation. A recent report from the independent monitoring board that looked into detention conditions in family pre-departure accommodation at Gatwick called for this detention centre to be closed… Detaining families for removal must be re-examined, with the utmost concern given to the welfare of children at all times.”

 Baroness Mobarik (Conservative) 

 

“In Manchester, we have Pennine House, an immigration detention centre close to Manchester Airport. A few years ago, there was an absolutely damning inspection report into that facility. When the then Government made their response, it was ‘We’re going to ignore all the recommendations in this report’. What is the point of having a debate about regulations about how we are going to care for people in these places if, when it is not being done properly and when independent inspectors go in and say, “This is wrong. This is not what is supposed to be happening”, the Government just turn around and ignore them?” 

 The Lord Bishop of Manchester 


Other points raised by peers 

 In relation to the AAR SG changes:  

  • The Home Office has failed to provide compelling evidence to support the introduction of the Second Opinion Policy, as highlighted by the Lords’ SLSC 
  • The Home Office’s external consultation on the changes was inadequate 
  • The government must urgently provide more details, including terms of reference and a timeframe, about its planned review of detention, which it has stated will include the AAR SG changes 

 

More generally on detention:  

  • There are ongoing safeguarding failures in detention  
  • There are particular risks faced in detention by pregnant women, as well as LGBTQI+ people, and people with severe mental health conditions 
  • There is an urgent need for the new government to implement all of the recommendations of the recent Brook House Inquiry, including introducing a time limit on detention 
  • The government’s decision to continue the re-opening of Campsfield and Haslar IRCs, started under the previous government, is worrying. It will expand the detention estate by up to 1,000 new detention spaces 

How has the government responded?

Home Office Minister Lord Hanson of Flint’s response during the debate left many questions unanswered.  

He confirmed that government is carrying out a review of the Adults at Risk policy and Detention Centre Rules 34 and 35 which will look at “improving the effectiveness of the regulations and safeguards”. The review will include consultation with NGOs and is anticipated to conclude by spring 2025.  

You can read Lord Hanson’s speech in full here. 

 

 

Series of briefings on detention for new MPs

Following the 2024 general election, more than half of all MPs are newly elected – 335 in total. Many are unfamiliar with the reality of the UK’s immigration detention system, the devastating impacts it can have on those subjected to it, and the urgent need for fundamental change. 

To address this Medical Justice has jointly published a series of short briefings on detention, produced in collaboration with Detention Action, Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) and the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA). 

The briefings provide an introduction to the key facts and concerns about detention, as well making a number of recommendations for change. They are aimed at new MPs, but can be used by others too. 

The need for action on detention is more urgent than ever. The 2023 Brook House Inquiry report into the abuse of detained people found near-routine levels of inhuman and degrading treatment; since then, the Independent Monitoring Board at Brook House has found that the IRC has become even less safe, while HM Inspectorate of Prisons has reported finding the worst detention conditions ever seen in the UK at Harmondsworth IRC. Yet disturbingly, the new Labour government has announced plans to expand detention and increase removals, whilst also allowing key safeguarding mechanisms for vulnerable detained people to be weakened.  

 

If you have time, please do consider emailing the briefings to your MP. Doing so will help make MPs aware that their constituents are concerned by detention and want to see them taking urgent action to address the harm it causes. 

Don’t know your MP and/or their email address? Enter your postcode here to find them 

 

You can download the briefings below, as a full set or separately.


Briefings on UK immigration detention – full set

 

Briefing 1: What is detention?

Briefing 2: Access to justice

Briefing 3: Harm caused by detention / safeguarding failures

Briefing 4: Use of force and segregation

Briefing 5: Costs

Briefing 6: Recommendations to government

Frank Ospina killed himself following multiple clinical safeguarding failures that contributed to his death

The Home Office locked Frank up in an environment known to cause severe harm co, then its notoriously dysfunctional and failing safeguarding ran their fatal course.

On 11th October 2024 an inquest jury found that Frank, a 39 year old Colombian man, killed himself in a locked cell at Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) on 26th March 2023 after three incidents of self-harm or attempted suicide. The jury found that multiple failings contributed to Frank’s death. 

The Home Office cannot keep saying that it takes every detained person’s safety seriously – it is patently not true  

Medical Justice clinicians and caseworkers assist over 600 people in detention each year and encounter alarmingly high suicide risk levels and deterioration in health on a daily basis – we provide evidence of these ongoing systemic and lethal failures to the Home Office, yet IRCs remain as dangerous as ever. HM Inspector of Prisons reported in July 2024 on the worst conditions it has seen in detention, including a ligature point not removed despite being used in three suicide attempts. 

Immigration detention is known to cause severe harm – the evidence is undisputed. Yet, chillingly, the Home Office has purposefully weakened its already failing clinical safeguards at the same time as planning to expand detention. Clearly, increasing detention whilst weakening safeguards means severely harming more people. This harm is not accidental.  

“That would have been the last opportunity I had to embrace my son but I couldn’t” – Frank’s Mother 

Frank had disclosed no health issues when he was detained on 4th March 2023 for working without permission while spending time near his mother in the UK before taking up a place on a master’s course in Spain. 

He became suicidal in detention and jumped from the second floor internal balcony, landing on safety netting. He was found banging his head against a wall after self-harming with a television cable which he insisted to staff he had been using to whip rather than strangle himself.   

Frank’s mother, who left the coroner’s court in tears, described in a statement her struggle to book a visit with her son at Colnbrook and was eventually allowed a “closed visit” behind a glass screen which the inquest found “contributed to the deterioration of his mental health and incurred further stress”. She said “I was horrified, as I did not recognise my son. He was staring at me as if I was not there. … I felt helpless … That would have been the last opportunity I had to embrace my son but I couldn’t.”  Frank’s brother-in-law, Julian Llano, told the BBC: “He kept insisting that he felt very bad, mentally, that he needed to get out of there. He didn’t ask for help – he begged for help, not only to us, but also to the people there.” 

Unacceptably inadequate suicide watch observations failed to recognise Frank was not in his bed and was in fact dead 

On 19th March a triage nurse assessed Frank and advised him to eat healthily, do some exercise and keep busy. 

On the day he died, Frank was on a suicide prevention plan that required him to be checked on by a Detention Custody Officer (DCO) twice each hour after being deemed a “ticking time bomb”. CCTV shows that on 26th March, a DCO checked on Frank at 7.22am, 7.42am and 7.52am and said that he saw Frank in bed on each occasion. At around 8.00am, another DCO took over and falsely recorded that he had checked on Frank at 8.30am – CCTV shows that he did not. 

Shortly after 9.00am, the DCO went to Frank’s cell. He opened the door and looked in. Frank was not in his bed. The DCO closed the door and called for other staff. After 13 minutes, staff attended and went into the room, finding Frank lying on the floor of the toilet area. Staff started CPR even though there were signs that Frank had been dead for some time as he appeared stiff and cold. No one called a medical emergency code. When healthcare staff arrived, they also continued with CPR until paramedics arrived and confirmed that Frank was dead. 

Rigor mortis and staining on Frank’s body suggests he had been dead for at least 2 hours. The Prison & Probation Ombudsman noted that this casts doubt on the DCO’s account that he saw Frank in bed at 7.22am, 7.42am and 7.52am.  

The inquest jury found Frank died by suicide, having been left in possession of an item which could be used for suicide, despite three instances of self-harm or suicide attempts in the previous days. 

Two days later, an “attempted mass suicide” took place at Harmondsworth IRC, adjacent to Colnbrook IRC. 

“if we had done the Rule 35  … then we wouldn’t have had that outcome.” – Colnbrook IRC healthcare 

An IRC doctor who treated Frank in an emergency appointment after his first suicide attempt failed to undertake a ‘Rule 35’ report alerting the Home Office of Frank’s suicidality and triggering a review of his continued detention. Frank later again told staff that he was having thoughts of suicide but again, no Rule 35 report was submitted. Asked at the inquest why not, the Practice Plus Group (PPG) head of healthcare at Colnbrook said: “It was not done. Healthcare missed that … We keep a waiting list for Rule 35 … At some point we had a waiting list of over 100 people… I can confidently say that if we had done the Rule 35 on the 22nd or 23rd [of March], then we wouldn’t have had that outcome.” He also added that the number of people waiting for a Rule 35 “has only increased.” 

In a statement  to Liberty Investigates PPG stated that there is no legal time limit for completing a Rule 35 and that urgent mental health issues are best dealt with via good clinical care instead. It confirmed that Frank was not even on the waiting list for a Rule 35 assessment. 

Four ’Part C’ forms about Frank’s situation were submitted in the four days leading up to his death, but each time Home Office staff failed to forward them to his case worker and no assessment was made. 

Medical Justice is not surprised by the failures and neither should the Home Office be as it has the data 

Based on our evidence from assisting over 600 clients in detention each year, we have been warning the Home Office for the last 20 years that Rule 35 is not working, about dangerously long waiting lists for assessments, the specific lack of Rule 35(2) reports on suicide risk, and the inadequacies of suicide watch processes.   

The Medical Justice “If he dies, he dies” research report found an alarming 74% of the 66 clients cases examined for the report had self-harmed, had suicidal thoughts and/or attempted suicide in detention yet very few Rule 35(2) reports documenting their suicidality were completed. Even after people attempted suicide, Rule 35(2) reports are rarely completed, and if they are, the assessment is often inadequate and incomplete, for example missing information such as a suicide attempt. Of the 46 detained people in this case-set who had suicidal thoughts, this was documented in their medical records for only 23. There should be a Rule 35(2) report for everyone on suicide watch. The Independent Monitoring Board’s report for Yarl’s Wood IRC published 17th October 2024 noted that just 1 of 181 detained people on suicide-watch had a Rule 35(2) report. 

It’s not a matter of ‘if’, but ‘when’ the next person dies in detention – Medical Justice challenging the inexcusable inertia   

A Home Office spokesperson said: “We offer our sincere condolences to Mr Ospina’s loved ones, and since his death in 2023 a number of actions have been taken to improve the safeguards for individuals in detention”. Yet disturbingly the Home Office has weakened its key Adults at Risk policy which sets out how Rule 35 reports are considered, removing the aim of reducing the number of vulnerable people in detention. Furthermore, it plans to re-open and expand two IRCs, adding capacity to detain an additional 1,000 people at any given time. 

Following the Brook House [public] Inquiry (BHI) finding that the wholesale dysfunction of safeguards led to alarming levels of inhuman and degrading treatment in detention in 2017, the Home Office has mentioned a review of its Rule 35 policy but not provided any details about what this review will entail. Meanwhile, NHS England has produced Rule 35 Guidance – which Medical Justice has raised concerns about – as an interim measure before commissioning training from a Royal College on Rule 35, which has been paused while the Home Office review is awaited.   

On 14th October 2024, supported by Medical Justice, the House of Lords debated Adults at Risk policy changes, which are contrary to BHI recommendations. We learned that the review is to be completed by “spring 2025”.  Meanwhile, at least 312 people were on suicide watch in IRCs between April and June 2024. 

Regarding ongoing Rule 35 failures and the increasing numbers of deaths in detention, Medical Justice will ; 

  • Continue with urgency our policy advocacy aimed at the Home Office and NHS England  
  • Support the securing of an adjournment debate about conditions at Harmondsworth and Colnbrook IRCs 
  • Support and hopefully join parliamentarians in meeting with Ministers about the deaths and safeguarding failures 
  • Send our independent clinicians to visit suicidal clients in detention and produce medico-legal reports 
  • Continue our specialised casework, providing emotional support for suicidal clients and advocating for them 

When life is difficult, Samaritans are here – day or night, 365 days a year. You can call them for free on 116 123, email them at jo@samaritans.org, or visit samaritans.org to find your nearest branch. 

Vacancy | Clinical Assessor – Psychologist

WE ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS

See our Vacancies page for all current job opportunities

Please sign up to our mailing list to stay up to date with any future job opportunities

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST


We are recruiting for an exciting opportunity to join the Medical Justice team as soon as possible as a Clinical Assessor – Psychologist.

Please see the Application Pack for more details.

 


Clinical Assessor – Psychologist

Salary: £10,438.01 per annum fer day (for one or two days a week; £52,190.03 per annum pro-rata)

Reports to: Clinical Advisor

Job purpose:To carry out assessments for people detained in IRCs. To write Medico-legal reports in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol.

Working hours: 1-2 day a week (please indicate your preference on the application).

The post holder will be expected to be flexible and to occasionally be available out of hours where urgent action is required based on one of their own assessments (for example, if information is needed urgently for an imminent deadline in the person’s legal case, they might be asked to write a letter. There is no requirement to provide on-call cover other than such occasional needs relating to your own cases).

Flexible working hours and flexible arrangements for remote working are possible.

Where based: The post-holder will visit IRCs to carry out assessments for detained clients. Report writing can be done from our office in Finsbury Park or remotely. The post holder will be expected to attend occasional team meetings, trustees’ meetings, training events and other gatherings as required.

Length of contract: Permanent. The probation period will be six months.

Terms:Pro rata 24 days per annum holiday, plus statutory bank holidays and 4 additional days’ holiday associated with bank holidays which may be decided on by your manager (usually associated with the office closure during Christmas and New Year).

To apply: Please read the application form and complete the form within it. Email your completed application form and your CV to Anthony at a.omar@medicaljustice.org.uk

Deadline for application: This role is being advertised on a rolling basis so we may close the vacancy when a suitable candidate is found. Shortlisted candidates will be asked to provide a sample of (anonymised) written work and will be invited for interview. The ideal timeframe for starting the job is as soon as possible.


For more information about Medical Justice, the full job description and application form, please download the Application Pack

Vacancy | Casework Traineeship (Lived Experience)

WE ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS

Please sign up to our mailing list to stay up to date with any future job opportunities

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST


Do you have personal lived experience of the UK asylum and immigration system and/or immigration detention in the UK and would like to work as a casework trainee?

Come and work with Medical Justice, a small and dynamic team that builds on casework to produce research that is used to challenge systemic failures in healthcare provision in immigration detention. We expose medical mistreatment in detention and strive for lasting change for all detained people through policy work, strategic litigation, media coverage and parliamentary action.

As a trainee at Medical Justice, you’ll have the chance to learn extensively about Medical Justice and our operational framework as a charity. You will be working as part of our casework team which works directly with people in detention to support them in accessing adequate healthcare and obtaining high-quality independent medical evidence to progress their legal case. You’ll also gain exposure to all areas of our organisation, with the opportunity to interact with research, policy, and advocacy colleagues. This practical experience will give you first-hand experience in the different areas that Medical Justice works in and how we collaborate across those areas to advocate for systemic improvements as well as deliver impactful support for clients.

Our traineeship program is designed to enhance your understanding of the immigration system and broader detention issues, enabling you to gain deeper insights into the interconnected issues and challenges experienced by individuals within these systems.

Through this holistic approach to learning, we hope you’ll emerge from the traineeship equipped with a nuanced understanding of the immigration and detention sectors, as well as valuable insights into the inner workings of Medical Justice as a charity dedicated to promoting justice and human rights. We hope this experience will help to enhance your prospect of further employment with Medical Justice or in the sector, whilst also increasing lived experience amongst Medical Justice staff.

 


For full Job Description and Application Form download the Application Pack

 

Job Title: Casework Traineeship (Lived Experience)

Salary: London Living Wage – £25,642.50 per annum (pro rata)

Reports to: Casework Manager/Senior Caseworker

Working hours: 3 days per week

Based: Medical Justice office (near Finsbury Park, London)

Length of contract: 6 months

Terms: 8 days holiday, plus statutory bank holidays. Other conditions as statutory requirements and/or Medical Justice polices.

Timeline: The closing date for applications is Sunday 17th November 2024. The interview dates are Monday 25th, Tuesday 26th or Wednesday 27th November 2024 at the Medical Justice office and will include a written and verbal exercise. The ideal timeframe for starting the job is as soon as possible.

To apply: Please read the Application Pack which includes the Job Description and the application form. Email your competed application form and your CV to Anthony at a.omar@medicaljustice.org.uk

We look forward to receiving your application !


Support from Experts by Experience Employment Network

We are proud to be a member of the Experts by Experience Employment Network (www.ebeemployment.org.uk), which aims to increase representation of people with lived experience in the charitable sector.

If you are an expert by experience (a refugee or a migrant with direct, first-hand experience of issues and challenges of the UK asylum or immigration system), you can ask for an independent and confidential support for your job application from the Experts by Experience Employment Network (www.ebeemployment.org.uk). Please complete this form to request support and they will confirm if they can match you with a mentor to support your application.

Please feel free to use information and resources at https://www.ebeemployment.org.uk/ebe which may help in preparing your job application. The Network can also mentor the lived experience trainee during and after their traineeship with Medical Justice, for up to 8 sessions.


Information Sessions

We are offering informal information sessions about Medical Justice and its work as well as an opportunity to ask questions about the Casework Traineeship (Lived Experience) role and the organisation before the application deadline.

Our final session will be Monday 11 November at 1.15pm

If you are interested in participating, please email our Office Manager, Anthony Omar on a.omar@medicaljustice.org.uk for more information.

“You’ll see the outside when you’re in Rwanda”

“You’ll see the outside when you’re in Rwanda”: Mistreatment in UK detention and mass round ups for forced removals 

Medical Justice press release for immediate release September 2024

Click here to read the report

We publish our report today analysing the devastating experiences of those rounded up en masse, held in immigration detention and threatened with forced removal to Rwanda in 2024. We do so marking the anniversary of the publication of the report of the Brook House Inquiry, the public inquiry revealing conditions that led to disturbing levels of inhuman and degrading treatment in detention. Detained people are still being subjected to the failures underlying these conditions today, across all UK detention centres. 

Our report comes a few weeks after the new Labour government announced plans for a “large surge in enforcement and return flights” and to expand immigration detention by opening Campsfield and Haslar Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) and days after Keir Starmer said he was “interested” in learning about Italy’s offshoring scheme in Albania.  

Detention conditions have recently been described by inspectors to be the worst they have seen, and safeguards meant to protect vulnerable people in detention have been weakened. This report shines a light on the brutal reality of immigration detention to facilitate removal and the harm that is set to be repeated by a large surge in flights and expansion of detention. 

Ahead of forced removal charter flights, people are rounded up en masse and locked up in large numbers in detention. This often includes many vulnerable people with histories of torture, trafficking and trauma, who are fearful of the country they are being forcibly sent to. Holding them in detention, an environment that is inherently harmful, causes distress and avoidable suffering. The threatened forced removals to Rwanda in 2024, the subject of this report, is the latest example of this.   

Analysing the casefiles, experiences and clinical evidence, of 30 clients who were rounded up and detained for forced removal to Rwanda between 29 April and 4 May 2024, this research has found  

  • People were handcuffed and detained with no warning, resulting in shock, fear and confusion, as well as suicidal thoughts and self-harming. Those detained included men and women, whose nationalities included Syrian, Eritrean, Ethiopian, Afghani, Iranian and Sudanese. 
  • All were seeking asylum. None had a criminal conviction. 80% of the cohort had histories of torture and/or serious ill-treatment, trafficking and mental health conditions, which made them particularly susceptible to suffering harm as a result of detention and also as a result of the threat of removal to a country which they feared.  
  • During the round up, two clients were recorded to have lost consciousness or collapsed during the process of being detained including one woman who fainted. Both were transferred to A&E and then on to an IRC. 
  • 10 did not have any legal representation at the time of their detention and receiving their Notice of Intent for removal to Rwanda. 
  • Trafficking survivors likened their trafficking experience with detention for removal to Rwanda. 
  • There were alarmingly high suicide risk levels and deterioration; Medical Justice clinicians assessed 11 clients, all of whom were found to have mental health conditions, including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and all 11 deteriorated in their mental state. 9 of had suicidal thoughts, 2 had self-harmed and 1 attempted suicide shortly after they were detained. 8 expressed that they will or would take their own life if they were forcibly removed to Rwanda. 
  • With a surge of people arriving into detention who have complex healthcare needs a, the dysfunction of detention safeguards was acutely evident, failing to identify, protect and route vulnerable individuals out of detention. None of the 30 people had a Rule 35 (1) or (2) safeguarding report completed as should have happened, including for those who were suicidal.  
  • People were held in detention for up to 50 days which the Home Office justified by stating that a flight was planned within a “reasonable timeframe” even though flights were not imminent in reality and never took off.   
  • The harm caused by detention continued after clients were released back into the community. 

 This picture of harm is what has characterised many mass round-ups for highly publicised charter deportation flights. 

 

Ahmad*, a torture survivor, was in bed when four people entered his room. One was carrying a shield, another carried what he thought was a gun.  He was handcuffed and taken by force from his bedroom. For Ahmad, this was a terrifying trigger of past experiences of being tortured. For the Home Office, it was an opportunity to film and broadcast Ahmad’s ordeal (what Ahmad thought was a gun was in fact a video camera) and to publicise the cruelty inflicted on those targeted for deportation to Rwanda. 

 

Mark* told Medical Justice after he was released that he is “terrified” to report as required to the Home Office that he will be re-detained.   

 

Serena* asked when she will be able to leave and was told “you’ll see the outside when you’re in Rwanda”. 

 

This dossier evidences the predictable and severe harm caused by the 2024 mass round-up for the Rwanda charter flight – it’s nothing short of a tragedy that it’s so similar to our last dossier on round-ups for deportation charter flights. The new government should abandon its plans to expand detention and ramp up deportation flights that will cause more harm, knowingly – harm that is avoidable, and indeed not accidental. 

We agree with the British Medical Association that IRCs should be phased out.  Meanwhile, increasing detention before any of the Brook House Inquiry recommendations have been implemented is simply an afront to human decency.” – Ariel Plotkin, Medical Justice Researcher 

 

Available for interview : Dr Rachel Bingham, Medical Justice clinician 

Contact : emma.ginn@medicaljustice.org.uk / 07786 517379 

  

*Not their real names 

 

Download the report “You’ll see the outside when you’re in Rwanda”: Mistreatment in UK Detention and Mass Round Ups for Forced Removals” 

 

Notes 

  1. Only 1 of 33 of the Brook House Inquiry’s recommendations has been agreed by the Home Office 
  2. Medical Justice is the only charity that sends independent volunteer clinicians to visit clients detained in IRCs to document their scars of torture, deterioration of health and injuries sustained during violent incidents.  Each year we assist more than 500 people held in immigration detention each year. We publish research, undertake policy work and strategic litigation, and act as the secretariat for the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Immigration Detention. Medical Justice was appointed as a Core Participant of the Brook House Inquiry (BHI) due to its extensive first-hand experience of the clinical safeguarding and healthcare failures in IRCs .  Our comprehensive evidence submitted to BHI was pivotal in demonstrating a causal link between the complete failure of clinical safeguards and the violent abuse uncovered.